Article
Published
6 August 2025
In recent years, sustainability has evolved from a peripheral concern to a central pillar of business strategy. Organisations are no longer debating whether to engage but rather how to align their actions with shifting expectations, at a pace and scale that makes commercial sense.Â
Yet, as we progress through 2025, the path to sustainable transformation is proving less linear than anticipated. A resurgence of political resistance, particularly in Washington and across parts of Europe, has created a more unpredictable backdrop. Regulatory incentives, once considered dependable drivers of corporate sustainability action, are now facing renewed scrutiny. For many companies that previously relied on policy certainty to justify bold initiatives, strategic leadership now demands a different kind of foresight. One rooted in stakeholder engagement, shifting market dynamics, and the pursuit of long-term competitiveness.Â
Despite these headwinds, the underlying commercial case for sustainable transformation remains robust. Environmental degradation, resource scarcity, and social fragmentation are no longer abstract concerns. They represent immediate operational risks affecting supply chains, cost structures, and brand reputation. Moreover, key stakeholders – including customers, investors, and employees – continue to evaluate companies not merely on financial returns but on their capacity to create lasting value. In this environment, treating sustainability as a discretionary initiative or deprioritising it in the short-term carries increasing strategic risks. Conversely, firms that integrate it into their business core will enhance resilience, unlock innovation, and cultivate new sources of competitive advantage.
Decision-making reimagined: Moving from trade-offs to total impact thinking
Traditionally, business decisions were assessed through a narrow financial lens. Sustainability was often perceived as a commendable but costly undertaking. A trade-off between doing good and doing financially well. That binary view is increasingly outdated. Today, the failure to incorporate social and environmental considerations is more than a reputational hazard; it is a material oversight with direct operational and financial implications. The challenge is no longer about motivation but about embedding sustainability into the organisation’s management systems and decision-making architecture.
Recent Implement Consulting Group surveys of over 150 European firms uncover a revealing paradox: While 87% of executives cite sustainability as a strategic priority, only 60% report it is fully embedded into their business transformation efforts. As regulatory certainty wavers, the risk of an execution gap widening is tangible.
Addressing this requires a recalibration of how firms define and measure value. Forward-thinking companies are evolving their internal decision frameworks to assess environmental and social dimensions with the same analytical rigour applied to classic financial metrics. This shift goes beyond compliance or ESG reporting; it is about enhancing decision quality through a more comprehensive understanding of risks, opportunities, and long-term value creation.
Rio Tinto
For example, Rio Tinto – once the poster child of unsustainable mining – is now piloting internal measures to track biodiversity outcomes and community impacts. These are not regulatory KPIs but strategic tools, designed to align ecological and social performance with long-term business resilience. Their nature strategy includes site-level biodiversity initiatives, while the Local Voices programme gathers real-time community feedback to inform operational decisions. This shift reflects a move from sustainability as a communications exercise to a foundation for enterprise-wide value creation – where environmental and social metrics are leveraged not for external validation, but as core drivers of strategic performance.
Purpose reimagined: Thinking beyond the customer to build a credible purpose
In today’s fractured political environment, stakeholder trust is both more fragile and more vital than ever. The companies best positioned to navigate uncertainty are those grounded in a clear, credible purpose.
However, purpose must extend beyond marketing narratives; it must be operationalised. The firms poised for sustainable success are those that look beyond simplistic customer-centricity and fulfilling any latent need that might constitute a promising business opportunity. Rather, truly purpose-driven companies move above and beyond a narrow-minded customer perspective and adopt bigger picture thinking. They see and take on a global and systemic perspective. The critical question becomes: What role does the company play in addressing societal challenges that intersect with its business model? How does it create shared value across its broader stakeholder ecosystem?
Aligning corporate purpose with systemic challenges – such as climate resilience, resource efficiency, or social inclusion – can unlock significant commercial opportunities. Companies that credibly position themselves as enablers of sustainable solutions are likely to capture new market segments, attract values-driven talent, and justify long-term investments even in regions where policy frameworks are in flux. In short, they are riding the long-term trend.
This dynamic is particularly evident in consumer sectors, where firms are redefining their role not simply as product providers, but as facilitators of sustainable lifestyles. This strategic reframing informs decisions across sourcing, design, partnerships, and logistics, transforming sustainability from a perceived cost centre into a dynamic platform for growth and differentiation.
Lipton
As an example, Lipton, the British tea brand owned by Ekaterra (formerly part of Unilever), has strategically repositioned itself as a credible leader in environmental sustainability by reimagining its supply chain from farm to consumer. In line with Unilever’s broader ambition to build purpose-led brands, Lipton partnered with the Rainforest Alliance to certify its tea farms against evolving environmental and social standards.Â
This collaboration ensures agricultural practices that protect ecosystems and improve working conditions, including targeted training to reduce pesticide use. By committing to sourcing exclusively from certified farmers, Lipton not only reinforces trust with customers but also elevates industry-wide expectations, enabling smallholders to command premium prices while amplifying the Rainforest Alliance’s influence across global supply chains.
Business models reimagined: Designing sustainable business models for a new market reality
In an era where regulatory momentum is uneven, the impetus for change increasingly resides within corporate strategy itself. This places a premium on rethinking how value is generated and sustained over time.
Many legacy business models remain entrenched in linear value chain processes and business model designs – extract, produce, sell, discard. This approach is becoming economically untenable as resource constraints, supply chain volatility, and shifting consumer expectations converge. Business models based on circularity, regeneration, and decoupling growth from resource usage are moving from the periphery to the mainstream.
Companies blazing the trail with service-oriented models, product life extension strategies, and closed-loop thinking are finding not only environmental benefits but also tangible economic gains. These models can buffer firms from commodity price volatility, reduce exposure to tightening (or returning) regulatory requirements, and open new revenue streams. Importantly, adopting such models positions companies to be more agile in responding to policy shifts, competitive dynamics, and consumer demand.
Novo Nordisk
Novo Nordisk’s ReMed™ programme exemplifies how pharmaceutical companies can integrate circular economy principles into their business models. Launched in 2021, ReMed™ enables patients to return used single-use medical devices to designated collection points, such as pharmacies, for recycling into new materials. This initiative addresses the environmental impact of the approximately 800 million injection pens produced annually by the company.
The programme has expanded from pilot projects in Denmark to the rest of the world, and it includes competitors. By reclaiming valuable materials from used devices, Novo Nordisk not only reduces waste but also supports its broader sustainability goals, including a commitment to zero environmental impact by 2045. ReMed™ reflects a strategic shift from traditional linear models to circular systems, where product life cycles are extended through reuse and recycling. This approach not only mitigates environmental harm but also enhances stakeholder trust and positions Novo Nordisk as a leader in sustainable healthcare innovation.
Ecosystems reimagined: Winning through collaborative advantages and partnerships
One lesson is clear in this era of ambiguity: no firm can achieve meaningful sustainability outcomes in isolation. Competitive advantage is increasingly contingent on an organisation’s ability to orchestrate collaborative ecosystems. This requires moving collaboration upstream, involving suppliers, customers, competitors, and regulators early in problem-solving processes.
To make ecosystems work, companies must shift from controlling every aspect of their value chain to orchestrating partnerships where knowledge, data, and resources are shared. This involves setting joint targets, defining common metrics, and co-investing in solutions that benefit all stakeholders. Practical steps include forming cross-sector alliances, piloting shared projects, and creating open standards in areas where regulation lags behind.
Internally, companies need teams that are skilled at managing collaborative projects, not just procurement or sales. This means building capabilities in ecosystem mapping, governance design, and trust-building. It also requires leadership to signal that long-term system value takes precedence over short-term competitive wins.
Vattenfall
As a clear case in point, Vattenfall in 2024 committed to achieving a fully circular outflow of permanent magnets from decommissioned wind turbines by 2030. These magnets, essential for turbine efficiency, contain rare-earth elements that are both environmentally and geopolitically sensitive. Rather than waiting for regulation, Vattenfall is proactively building a circular supply ecosystem, aligning with the EU’s Critical Raw Materials Act to reduce dependency on virgin materials.
To achieve this, Vattenfall is collaborating with partners like CAREMAG and Cyclic Materials to develop industrial-scale recycling processes and shared recovery infrastructure. These cross-sector alliances extend beyond traditional supplier relationships, fostering joint innovation, standard-setting, and system-wide resource efficiency. As formal regulatory mechanisms fluctuate, such voluntary partnerships offer a flexible yet powerful means of shaping market norms and influencing industry trajectories.
Turning purpose into progress
Embedding sustainability at the heart of leadership decision-making and business strategy calls for organisational reimagination. It is no longer sufficient for sustainability to reside in a discrete department; it must become a lens through which strategic decisions are designed and evaluated.
One emerging catalyst is the double materiality assessment framework introduced under the EU’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD). While debates continue in Brussels over the pace and scope of such regulations and some companies have treated the framework as a cumbersome compliance exercise, leading companies are advancing their internal assessments irrespective of external mandates. The rationale is clear: robust materiality analysis not only illuminates where stakeholder expectations intersect with business priorities but also enhances internal alignment, strategic clarity, and operational focus.
Executing on this vision requires targeted capability building. Finance teams must become adept at integrating sustainability considerations into financial planning and risk management. Supply chain functions need transparency tools to track and manage environmental and social impacts. Innovation units must incorporate holistic lifecycle thinking from product and service conception. Perhaps most critically, executive leadership must foster cross-functional integration, ensuring that sustainability is not a siloed initiative but a shared enterprise-wide imperative.
As certain regulatory initiatives face rollback pressures, there is a temptation for businesses to interpret this as a reprieve from action. Such a stance overlooks the fundamental forces reshaping markets – climate impacts, generational shifts in consumer expectations, supply chain vulnerabilities. These dynamics are not contingent on legislative cycles; they are structural realities already influencing business performance.
The question confronting today’s business leaders is no longer whether sustainability should be part of strategy. It is whether their strategy is resilient enough to sustain value creation in a world defined by rapid change, mounting environmental and social challenges, and evolving stakeholder demands.
Six questions for senior leaders
- How might we reimagine our corporate purpose, so it credibly addresses societal and global challenges while securing long-term business relevance and growth?
- How might we reframe how we define and measure value to ensure environmental and social performance alongside financial performance are treated as core drivers of long-term success and prosperity?
- How might we redesign our business models to move from linear, resource-intensive operations to circular and regenerative systems that future-proof profitability?
- How might we rewire our decision-making processes to consistently account for long-term impacts, even when short-term financial pressures dominate?
- How might we build ecosystems of partners beyond our immediate value chain to create collaborative advantage in solving systemic challenges and building resilience?
- How might we reconfigure our organisational structures, capabilities, and incentives to embed sustainability into every layer of the business?
Any questions?
Related0 4
Case
Read more
How do you get rid of waste in the healthcare value chain through circular solutions?
Working with Implement Consulting Group, a leading global pharmaceutical company focused on pioneering initiatives aimed...Case
Read more
How do you blaze the trail to become a zero environmental impact company?
Collaborating with Implement Consulting Group, a global pharmaceutical company significantly amplified its environmental...Article
Read more
Connecting sustainable choices with financial impact
As shifts in customer expectations and regulatory demands reshape industry standards, sustainability has become a strate...Article
Read more