Article

Operational readiness in European defence

As Europe accelerates its defence build-up, operational readiness is becoming a central strategic priority
Published

15 June 2026

Europe is preparing for its largest defence build-up in decades. Through the ReArm Europe / Readiness 2030 initiative, up to €800 billion could be mobilised to strengthen Europe's military capabilities as geopolitical tensions rise and demands for operational readiness intensify. At the same time, European governments are seeking to reduce strategic dependencies and strengthen domestic industrial capacity by shifting investments towards local production, technology, and supply chains.


Much of the attention is directed towards new platforms, advanced technologies, and future capabilities. But in practice, readiness is often determined by something far less visible: the ability to keep existing assets operational.


A fighter aircraft may be grounded because a certified component is unavailable. A naval vessel may remain docked due to repair backlogs. Critical systems may sit idle awaiting spare parts or repairs.


These are not isolated issues; instead, they reflect how maintenance, repair, and operations (MRO) are managed.


Keeping aircraft, vehicles, and weapon systems mission-ready requires continuous maintenance, repairs, upgrades, and access to spare parts throughout their lifecycle. As a result, MRO has become increasingly important, not only as a support function, but as a strategic capability directly linked to operational readiness. At the same time, it represents a significant business opportunity, with aftermarket services often generating higher margins than original equipment sales.


In this context, defence readiness is no longer defined only by what organisations procure, but by their ability to sustain and utilise existing fleets over time. This places MRO at the centre of the evolving European defence agenda.


From asset availability to operational readiness: understanding MRO

At its core, MRO ensures that assets remain available, reliable, and ready for deployment throughout their lifecycle.


In defence, this spans:

  • Maintenance and repair of assets such as aircrafts, vessels, trucks, and land systems
  • Management of spare parts and repairable components
  • Coordination of suppliers, depots, and technical expertise
  • Planning of maintenance activities aligned with missions

The importance of MRO becomes clear in practice. A fighter aircraft may be fully operationally available on paper, but if a single certified component is unavailable, it cannot fly. In this case, readiness is not limited by procurement, but rather by the performance of the MRO setup supporting it.


The core challenge: simple logic, complex reality

MRO follows a simple principle: right part, right place, right time.


In the defence industry, executing this becomes inherently complex due to:

  • Highly fragmented networks
    MRO spans original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), national depots, suppliers, and operational units across countries, resulting in limited end-to-end visibility and slow coordination.
  • High number of specialised spare parts portfolios
    Thousands of low-volume, platform-specific components must be managed simultaneously, resulting in high inventory complexity and significant capital tied up in stock.
  • Unpredictable demand
    Failures, missions, and ageing equipment create volatile demand patterns, resulting in difficult forecasting and reactive decision-making.
  • Criticality of individual components
    A single missing part can ground an entire system, resulting in disproportionate operational impact from small shortages.
  • Long and uncertain lead times
    Specialised production and certification processes delay replenishment, resulting in increased need for anticipation and resilience.

What this means in practice

In practice, the challenge is rarely a lack of awareness, but whether an organisation can coordinate MRO effectively at scale. MRO activities are too often managed in organisational silos, where maintenance planning optimises locally, supply planning reacts to immediate demand, and inventory decisions are disconnected from operational priorities.


The result is a fragmented setup where organisations risk overstocking non-critical parts while lacking mission-critical components when they are needed most. Decision-makers also often lack transparency into the trade-offs between cost, risk, and readiness.


In short, organisations may optimise individual activities without optimising operational readiness.


Turning MRO into a strategic capability

Across the defence industry, leading organisations are beginning to shift away from reactive MRO execution towards a more integrated and readiness-driven approach to MRO management. In this transition, four capabilities make the difference:

Why this matters now

As defence spending accelerates and geopolitical uncertainty continues to reshape the security landscape, organisations face a narrow window to strengthen and scale their MRO capabilities.


Organisations that succeed will be better positioned to:

  • Improve asset availability without proportionally increasing cost
  • Strengthen resilience against supply chain disruptions
  • Position themselves as strategic partners in the defence ecosystem

Whereas organisations that fail to adapt risk the opposite:

  • Increasing spending without improving readiness
  • Persistent operational bottlenecks
  • Continued dependency on fragile supply chains

The bottom line

As Europe accelerates defence investments, the ability to convert spending into operational readiness is becoming the defining challenge. MRO sits at the centre of this shift. Organisations that succeed in building scalable and resilient MRO capabilities will improve the availability of critical assets, thereby enhancing operational readiness and strengthening their role across the defence value chain.


At the same time, complexity continues to increase. And with it, operational demands rise and expectations for readiness intensify, leaving a limited window to act.

Check list

✓ Are you experiencing high costs from maintaining sufficient inventory of spare parts?


✓ Do you struggle to accurately forecast spare parts demand due to highly erratic and lumpy patterns?


✓ Are you finding it increasingly difficult to ensure the right skills and specialist capabilities are available at the right place and time?


✓ Are you experiencing high stock-out costs due to the criticality of parts for operations?


✓ Are you struggling to manage a complex distribution network with both global and local distribution centres to respond quickly to demand?

Related0 4