Human energy in organisations
It signals engagement in organisations when employees get involved, are enthusiastic about what they do and commit themselves to the task-solving and common goal.
Since 2000, Gallup has followed the employee engagement of more than 30,000 employees in the United States. In 2018, they could conclude that only 34% of respondents were engaged, while 13% were actively disengaged. The remaining 53% were in a “not engaged” category as employees who were perhaps satisfied and showed up for work, but who probably only delivered a minimum and were quickly on their way if they got a better job offer1. If we are to change these figures for the better, we need to find new ways to create engagement within our organisations.
Being engaged is linked to the human energy behind it. We can consider energy as an organisational resource that increases the capacity of employees to motivation and action so that they can do their job and achieve the goals set2. Energy that is needed for the people who need to do their very best every day – when stepping in and out of roles, working long hours, solving complex problems and constantly adapting to the technology needed to do their job. Demanding circumstances can deplete energy, which can lead to an absence of commitment – a commitment that is critical for sustainable organisations that need dedicated employees3. Fortunately, we can actively generate or maintain energy to build strength and resilience in the organisation.
For the past 20 years, the development of the capacity to mobilise energy in high-performing people has been explored in sports science. Each of us has the opportunity to increase performance through different human energy levels, in particular by building up our physical capacity. In addition, we also have the opportunity to develop and draw energy from the emotional and mental levels and to draw resources from a deeper sense of meaning and the values that contribute to our motivation and endurance4.
As management consultants working with managers, we learn that, in principle, it is often ordinary things that are crucial – no matter what level in the organisation we are working at. Everyday things you want to do more of. Things that you forgot to do. Or new things you want to introduce in your life. Something you want to think, say, feel or do differently. In connection with the development of a senior leadership group, a leader once said to me: “Well, these are the little things I have to decide to do ... and then do it!” Still, intentions want something new, while behaviour tends to want to stick to the old. We are up against the brain’s tendency to use the neural paths like it usually does, and it requires directional will, meaningful rituals and a good, supportive behavioural design that is followed all the way if we are to actually increase engagement through the development of human energy in organisations5.
Despite the fact that we have knowledge of how to build and support the development of individual energy for better performance, researchers point out that we do not yet know much about how energy can be usable at a relational level in order to achieve goals and results in the organisation6.
Some researchers define the energy as: “a heightened level of psychological resourcefulness generated from interpersonal interactions that enhances one’s capacity to do work.” (Owens et al. 2015:37). Since organisations can be seen as systems of interdependent individuals7, we can, from this perspective, make a shift in focus to a relatively unexplored source of energy in organisations, namely the relational energy.
This is the energy transfer that occurs between people where energy influences are shared and spread between employees and thus influence behaviour. Consider for example the following question: “Have you ever had a colleague, manager or team member that you felt energized by being near?” Through this question and the reflection on what happened in the situation, a change of perspective again takes place to you as a recipient of energy, and you find out what kind of influence an important other person has had on you and your performance.
Researchers have asked employees this question, and based on their answers they found three different types of energy stimulation. All with experienced transferred relational effects.
Table (Owens, Bradley & Baker, Wayne & Sumpter, Dana & Cameron, Kim, 2015) customised with own leader/employee examples.
Here we see examples of how leaders through relational energy influence the transfer of psychological resources to the employees towards their goals. This is interesting because the energy transfer is associated with changes in employee engagement and performance. It therefore calls for a completely new type of leadership role. There is an opportunity here to increase engagement. Try to think through the above table with your own examples! Potentially, it is also the case that relational energy can lead to increased psychological resilience, mental health and well-being in the organisation8 which is possible because we as humans are more likely to seek out those who generate feelings of excitement, enthusiasm and positivity than those who do not. Try again to think through your own examples! Through this tendency to seek positive energy, the new role of the leader will also be able to contribute to the sustainability of the organisation in several ways in addition to the increased commitment of the individual.
The researchers from before developed in their work five questions to be answered on a 1-5 scale (where 5 is “very much agreeable”). To understand the influence of relational energy, you as a leader can consider these five questions yourself, or you can ask the questions to your employees. In doing so, you will gain knowledge of where (from whom) energy is transferred to yourself or the employees and how the engagement is affected. It is valuable knowledge, and it gives leaders a new opportunity for changed conversations about resilience, engagement and performance as well as a whole new basis for action. But this presupposes that we buy into the condition that we as human beings influence each other in organisations through energy.
Here are the five questions that can be built into a traditional survey, a shorter pulse survey, or they can be integrated into reflections and conversations during development sessions.
When Gallup conducted its employee engagement survey, they saw a clear difference between the organisations they worked with and their performance. The highly engaged and high-performing organisations took advantage of scientific, evidence-based approaches that could transform individuals and business performance supported by strategic and operational solutions that could transform the culture of the organisation. The less successful organisations introduced well-intended and periodic engagement surveys. However, they seemed to focus more on the measurement and reading of survey data itself than on improving engagement in the organisation through follow-up, methodological discipline and concrete action9.
Gallup also studied the highly engaged and high-performing organisations. It is often overlooked, but there is actually a lot to learn from what we can call the positive deviants. What we can learn from those who do well. From some of these organisations, five paths can be proposed for optimising engagement at the strategic level:
As human beings we can adapt to a lot. Leaders and employees are naturally adaptable and are highly able to change in relation to the environment in which they are located. In order to increase and maintain engagement, it requires ongoing processes of personalised thoughts, feelings and actions, drawing on the psychological skills that one possesses. This is not something unusual or extraordinary, but something that all employees can do on a daily basis as a kind of protective factor in what scientists call “ordinary magic”10.
At the same time, it takes energy to act dedicated as an employee in a changing organisation, and therefore it must be mobilised continuously. If it is to be sustainable, it must be in a healthy balance between the perceived challenges and opportunities for recovery. In a principle between these extremes, we can face the day-to-day challenges in a resilient way through sensible energy. We can thrive even if it is difficult, we can bounce back if we lose energy for a while, and we can actually achieve growth through positive psychological change based on the challenges11.
The balance will be different from employee to employee, but at the same time it can also be seen in relation to the collegiate energy which in many situations makes up the context in which the employee is located. At the same time, it is also in this context that the leader’s new role as an energy supplier may apply. Through the motivating and engaging stimuli and interactions, the people who drive the company forward together can succeed with their goals in the long term if they take the mutual human impact seriously. The framework and preconditions of the work affect our energy as human beings and, conversely, the individual and relational energy ultimately also affects the engagement that supports the organisation’s performance in the long term. There is still a need to optimise energy and engagement at a time when we need to thrive and perform in organisations which by default are now characterised by volatility, uncertainty, complexity and ambivalence. It is something that is both challenging and rewarding at once, and it is something that calls for energy leadership.
1. Gallup: https://news.gallup.com/poll/241649/employee-engagement-rise.aspx2. Quinn, R. W., Spreitzer, G. M., & Lam, C. F. (2012). Building a sustainable model of human energy in organizations: Exploring the critical role of resources. The Academy of Management Annals, 6, 337–396. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2012.676762
3. Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Van Rhenen, W. (2009). How changes in job demands and resources predict burnout, work engagement, and sickness absenteeism. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 893–917. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.595
4. Loehr, J. E., & Schwartz, T. (2003). On form: Managing energy, not time, is the key to high performance, health and happiness. Boston, MA: Nicholas Brealey.
5. Clear, J. (2018): Atomic Habits: An Easy & Proven Way to Build Good Habits & Break Bad Ones, New York: Penguin Random House LLC.
6. Owens, Bradley & Baker, Wayne & Sumpter, Dana & Cameron, Kim. (2015). Relational Energy at Work: Implications for Job Engagement and Job Performance. The Journal of applied psychology. 101. 10.1037/apl0000032.
7. Griffin, M. A., Neal, A., & Parker, S. K. (2007). A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Academy of Management Journal
8. Sonnentag, S., Mojza, E. J., Demerouti, E., & Bakker, A. B. (2012). Reciprocal relations between recovery and work engagement: The moderating role of job stressors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 842–853. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0028292
9. Gallup: https://www.gallup.com/workplace/236495/worldwide-employee-engagement-crisis.aspx
10. Masten, A. S. (2001). Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development. American Psychologist, 56(3), 227–238. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.227
11. Lepore, Stephen & Revenson, Tracey. (2006). Resilience and Posttraumatic Growth: Recovery, Resistance, and Reconfiguration.
New features of SAP IBP 2005
Five selected features of the 2005 upgrade of SAP IBP.
Implement Consulting Group