Managing the demand for spare parts
How can we achieve high service levels without unnecessary high inventory cost? We suggest a structured method to manage the demand for spare parts, and illustrate a business case in a large global production company, where this method was applied. Not surprisingly, the economical benefits were very significant.
Effective control and management of spare parts are essential for many companies in most industries. The management of spare parts, enables companies to achieve high service levels without unnecessary high inventory cost.
Spare parts are often characterised of having intermittent and lumpy demand patterns with several periods of no demand mixed with sudden demand spikes. Furthermore, spare parts might have stock-out cost being disproportionally high in relation to the value of the component, and are thus very critical to have on stock, to prevent expensive downtime.
Companies acknowledge these challenges, but often do not have proper competence and knowledge to control these factors effectively, which leads to low service levels and high spare part inventories at unnecessary high cost.
This article suggests a structured method to manage the demand for spare parts, and illustrates a business case in a large global production company, where this method was applied. Not surprisingly, the economical benefits were very significant.
Managing the spare parts in a proper way, enables companies to maintain a high service level without unnecessary high inventory cost. However, intermittent demand patterns are often characterising spare parts, having periods of zero demand, with occasional periods with non-zero demands and in addition can be highly variable in quantity size. Furthermore, companies must recognise that some spare parts can be outmost critical, and might have stock-out costs that are disproportionally high compared to the value of the item.
Balancing the proper service level is an important aspect in this field. It can be argued that for some spare parts, the effect of stockout will significantly be more financially remarkable than “normal” SKUs, and thus has to be considered thoroughly. The intermittent demand coupled with the importance of balancing the service level, makes the planning of spare parts very difficult. In our experience, many production companies struggle to manage their spare part inventories sufficiently due to the high complexity, and thus many unnecessary costs are allocated to this area.
However, researches have showed that spare parts and related after-sales services accounted for 8% of the US Gross Domestic product (GDP) in 2008 – which illustrates a huge area of spending and revenues for companies, and is thus subject for great effects. This article suggests an approach for managing spare parts more efficiently by aligning supply and demand in regards to maintaining the required service level, but still keeping inventories at a minimum in order to minimize the total cost. Furthermore, it presents a business case from a large global production company where this approach was applied. Not surprisingly, the economical benefits were significant.
It is important to stress that spare parts have different factors and variables affecting them compared to those of “typical” SKUs like finished goods, and thus have to be managed differently.
Companies have often not the competence and knowledge on how to evaluate each spare part, for the purpose of determine what the inventory levels should be – this lack of transparency will eventually lead to costly overstocking, or insufficient service levels. Also, it should be stated, that some of the traditional inventory management tools cannot be applied in this context, e.g., JIT (just-in-time) and ABC analysis for finding most profitable item (e.g. profit per unit/no. of picks).
One of the main problems with the management, forecasting and control of spare part components is due to their lumpy demand characteristics. In the case of spare parts, the demand arises whenever a component fails or requires replacement, and as such it is different from that associated with a “typical” stock-keeping unit. In other words, this type of demand could be characterised as “intermittent”, which means that demand arrives infrequently and is dispersed by time periods with no demand at all, and can thus be extremely sporadic. The complexity of spare parts might stretch even more due to the high variability in quantity, size demanded.
Furthermore, spare parts have many factors/variables effecting the way to manage them – there is a huge difference in the level of criticality of the spare parts, some are much more critical than others and might have stock-out costs that are disproportionally high compared to the value of the item. And moreover, items of very low value can be outmost critical for the operation. In many cases, slow-moving and intermittent items will be made-to-order MTO), and thus the lead time might be very long.
Companies must recognise that spare parts often are “specific to employ”, which means in most cases spare parts have to be employed only for the specific use and the function for which it has been purchased. This might lead to the risk of accumulating large holdings of obsolete stock, that you would not be able to use.
Due to the intermittent nature that characterises many spare parts, “normal” forecasting principle and techniques may be inapplicable and inaccurate, and thus alternative methods will have to be utilised. This also holds good for the performance measurement tools used for measuring intermittent item.
Often companies have several thousand spare parts to manage, and all of these should obviously not be managed in the same way. Without a structured management approach, it would be extremely difficult to do.
The suggested approach for managing the spare parts properly consists of three steps: (1) determining input variables, (2) segmentation, (3) optimization. These steps are illustrated in figure 2, and will be elaborated in the following. It is important to underline that these steps should not be considered autonomously, but in derived conjunction as illustrated.
The input variables enable a specification and differentiation of the spare parts, for the purpose of a differentiated management approach. A segmentation/classification enables better decision-making towards each spare part, and thus less unnecessary cost.
The input criteria for the specification and categorisation of the spare parts into homogeneous groupings have to be chosen, with the focus on differentiating the forecasting and inventory approach, and thus the criteria have to be chosen according to this. The input variables that need to be considered are: criticality, demand characteristics and supply condition.
The criticality is a very important aspect in spare parts management. Obviously, not every spare part is equally important, and should thus be managed accordingly. Spare parts that are crucial for the production to operate will need to have a higher service level requirement and thus larger safety stock, than spare parts of lesser importance. In theory, the criticality is not very difficult to calculate, as it is based on only two variables: the cost of understocking and the cost of overstocking.
In practice however, it will in most cases be impossible to calculate the exact cost of having one unit too little and one unit too much on inventory. In practice, it will often be enough to make qualified subjective assessment of a few degrees of criticality, e.g., highly critical, moderately critical and low critical.
The actual characteristics of the demand, is another area that needs to be considered. As stated, spare parts can often be characterised as having very intermittent and lumpy demand patterns, having periods with zero demand, with occasional periods of non-zero demand.
This area needs to be explored, for the purpose of separating stable spare parts from unstable spare parts. This separation will be done according to 2x2 segmentation matrix, segmenting on the demand frequency (lines per lead time)) and the demand size variability (coefficient of variation (CV)) – see below.
While spare parts being in the predictable box (many lines per lead time and low CV), do not raise any significant forecasting and inventory control difficulties and can be managed with simple techniques, the spare parts characterised as being intermittent, erratic and lumpy, requires a different approach. Especially, spare parts characterised as being lumpy where demand history contains a large percentage of zero values, interspersed with spikes of non-zero demand that occur randomly, raises issues. For items like these, there is no apparent structure or pattern in the data, a phenomenon that most traditional forecasting methods do not manage well.
The fact is however, that the majority of items in spare part inventories have these characteristics. Extracting demand information regarding the sales cycle levels (phase-in, phase-out), will create a more accurate decision platform. Statistically forecasting analyses of historical demand patterns will not be possible for newly introduced items, and thus casual forecasting techniques should be utilised over statistical techniques for these. On the other hand, spare parts without demand records for many periods, might allow to be phased out. Furthermore, for spare parts with only a few of demand incidences registered, the data quality will be to limited for statistically analyses.
The supply conditions and the inbound flow of materials are another important area that needs to be specified and differentiated upon. To manage the supply and inbound flow of spare parts, it is important to consider the supply source, the suppliers and their conditions. For slow-moving and intermittent items, the lead time can be relatively long going up to many months. Spare parts are in many cases made-to-order, and thus significant production lead time may be present, this means that safety buffer will need to be established. On the contrary, spare parts can also be characterised as made-to-stock and thus available for delivery the following day, which allows for a minimum of safety buffer. These considerations will have to be made in order for an effective management of spare parts to be achieved.
The segmentation of spare parts should be done on the basis of the previous variables presented. This enables a specified management approach for each, instead of a uniform approach for all spare part items.
Analysing the spare parts with regards to different variables presented might reveal differentiated clusters, with the same kinds of characteristics. The benefit of clusters is that a more tailor-made approach can be developed towards each cluster. Establishing homogenized groups of spare parts into categories simplifies the task of facilitating decision-making with regards to inventory control and forecasting per category, instead of each SKU separately.
Determining the proper forecasting approach is crucial for reducing the inventories while maintaining the required service level. As argued for in a earlier section, spare parts characterized as having predictable demand patterns do not raise any special concern, and normal forecasting techniques can be utilized. However for spare parts with intermittent and lumpy patterns, these techniques may be very inaccurate.
Croston developed an approach for forecasting intermittent demand patterns in 1972, which has been established as the benchmark in both theory and practice since then. Shortly, it should be noted that different from traditional methods, Croston’s method uses the intermittent nature of the demand by separately updating the demand size and the demand interval, this will in many cases be more accurate for spare parts.
Companies must also be aware, that when it comes to performance measurement tools, some forecast error measures like mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) is not fit for zero-demand periods, and thus cannot be utilised when demand pattern is intermittent.
The inventory level and the safety stock represent the minimum amount of stock allowed for mitigating the risk of being stock-out. Due to the huge difference between criticality on the spare parts, there will be different service level requirements and thus safety stock. Furthermore, does a long lead time and intermittent demand pattern require a large safety stock inventory and vice versa. This means that, e.g., for spare parts determined as being highly critical (as input variable), and having a long lead time, the safety stock should be large. However, for items being highly critical but have day-to-day delivery lead time, the safety stock requirement allows to be very low or even none. This specification, segmentation and differentiation of inventory level requirements enables the ability to optimise the inventory to the specific spare part, and thus a more accurate and reduced inventory can be achieved.
Measuring the achieved service level (fill rate) on the specific segment on a regular basis insures that the inventory actually perform as intended, or if it needs to be reevaluated or modified.
The management approach suggested in this article was developed and applied in the context of a large international production company. The approach and findings will be illustrated in the following – not surprisingly, the economical effects of introducing this approach were significant.
The company was struggling with huge amount of spare parts inventories for their production lines, without knowing how to manage them effectively. The management of their spare parts inventories were characterised by lots of tacit knowledge and subjective decision making, which leads to great risk of overstocking. The company was thus a perfect subject for optimisation.
After establishing a profound foundation of knowledge in relation to the spare part criticality, demand characteristics, etc., we were able to analyse the relevant input variables in the context of the company and thus specify the spare part on a formal basis. This enabled a segmentation by clustering the spare parts characteristics, and 20 grouping were found. The input variables used were:
From this, 20 differentiated segments arose, and a differentiated inventory optimisation could be established. For these segments, several forecasting methods were tested, incl. SES, SMA and Croston’s method, and the most accurate was chosen for each cluster. Furthermore, the required safety stock level was calculated based on the lead time, demand variability and the determined service level.
After establishing the inventory levels derived from the suggested management approach, a comparison between the suggest inventory level and the actual inventory levels were established. By still maintaining the required service level of the spare parts, the total inventory level across all spare parts could, by utilising the suggested approach, be reduced by approximately 33%!
Operations management made simple
Bold manufacturing footprint decisions and The Lord of the Rings
7 viewpoints on S&OP implementation
Sales forecasting is not about complex algorithms
Operations management made simple
Implement Consulting Group