#3 Take a scientific approach
Strategy is about making choices. Great choices can only be made if the underlying reasoning is rock solid. That is why we must bring science into the art of strategy. To increase the odds of success, you must work like a scientist by identifying and validating the most critical assumptions that need to hold true for your strategy to work. Do it systematically through carefully designed fact-based tests.
Real strategy is based on validated assumptions.
81% of executives believe that data should be at the heart of all decision-making. We agree and firmly believe that you should take a data-driven approach to strategy. However, according to our experience, the traditional approach is broken. It is fundamentally unscientific.
Most strategies are developed by crunching numbers and studying strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. Based on the findings and intense discussions, vision and goals are determined, and conclusions about the best strategy are made. It seems like a great approach, and it has been taught at business schools for decades.
But if we think about it, there is a major issue. From a methodological point of view, the approach is flawed and does not adhere to the most basic principles of the scientific method.
The upfront analysis will surely help shape a strategy – a hypothesis about the future. But the up-front analysis does not prove that the suggested strategy is a good choice. To prove the strategy, you must test it like a scientist. In other words, once you have designed a potential strategy, you must ask the fundamental question:
What would have to be true for this to be the right strategy?
This question will enable you to identify the underlying assumptions which must hold true. It is crucial that key decision-makers are involved in the process. Together, you will be able to agree on the most uncertain and important assumptions. Those assumptions must be tested and proven in a systematic manner. Only then can you claim that data have been put at the heart of decision-making.
Design future strategies and test them like a scientist to create a sound basis for decision and increase the odds of success.
The text continues below the field.
The world’s top management thinker Roger Martin advocates for the use of assumptions and solid fact-based testing.
Go to Roger Martin’s HBR article where you can gain deeper insights and inspiration on how to use the scientific approach when working with strategy.
Do we ask the question “What would have to be true?” before deciding and prioritising our analytical resources to answer the most critical assumptions?
Do we involve all decision-makers in asking the question “What would have to be true”?
Do we use data and testing to verify what we already know or to learn, understand and deepen our strategic choice?
Implement Consulting Group is rewriting the strategy playbook. We do this by proposing dogmas for creating better strategies that are more fit for humans and fit for the future.
You can also visit the main page.
Go to Dogmas for Making Strategy Work
A winning strategy is the key to create long-term competitive advantage and to deliver superior financial returns.
Article in German: Some common misconceptions and seven simple steps for how to perform more effective change communication.
Implement Consulting Group